What is RAW Photography?

I’m sure most of you already know what the RAW format is and what it is used for, but according to a recent poll on dPS, 15% of their reader base claims to not know and therefore there’s still quite a few people out there searching for the answer to the question – What is RAW?

What is RAW photography?
Admittedly at first I was surprised by the results of this poll. I automatically assumed that with how popular digital photography is that everyone at least knew about the RAW format, but then I thought about it, and it started to make sense as to where this 15% came from.

I realized that even today most point and shoot cameras, and certainly all camera phones, both of which account for the vast majority of every-day photographers, only offer you JPEG formats. So if you’ve never seen it as an option of course you’d be more likely to not know what it is.

So anyways, this leads me into this post, about my take on the RAW format and why I personally shoot exclusively RAW. Of course, ultimately it’s a personal choice, which I’d gladly like to hear your own thoughts on in the comments below.

RAW Photography Explained

A RAW photograph is often referred to as the “digital negative” which draws the comparison to the 35mm film negatives of cameras from before the digital age. While, this essentially is a true statement, as we get further and further from a time when film cameras were the norm, those new to photography might not even be able to draw this connection for it assumes that you know what film is and how it was developed. I’m almost certain that a good percentage of people born today will never see one of these in person – let alone know what it is!

So then, what is a better comparison to the RAW format? How about whole milk? Not the kind you get from a store, but the completely unprocessed kind you’d get from a farm. It’s got the thick layer of fat on top of it and it has not been touched by any kind of person or machine. RAW photographs are somewhat the same in the sense that they’re filled with all the data you could possible want from the scene that you photographed and completely untouched by the camera’s processor.

But, of course, that metaphor is a bit silly so to put it as simply as possible for you a RAW file contains all the possible light that your camera saw in the time between when you opened and closed the shutter. The camera does not make any choices as to what to do with this data, it stores it all for you and allows you to determine how and what to adjust at a later time on your computer.

So What Can RAW Photos Do?

Before you can do anything with a RAW photograph you need the right tool, and there are many to choose from, but the one that I use and love is Adobe Lightroom. You can get Lightroom 3 for under $100 on Amazon or jump up to the most recent iteration and get Lightroom 4 for just under $150 also on Amazon (both of these prices are current as of the writing of this post and of course are subject to change). My opinion would be to throw down the extra 50 or so dollars and get LR4, Adobe added a lot to this version, but that’s not to say that LR3 is a bad deal.

Now as I tried to demonstrate above a RAW photograph contains everything that your camera could have possible seen when you pressed the shutter release and it has left the decisions on how to process this data up to you. All it knows is that there were a bunch of different light levels hitting its sensor at various points for however long you set your exposure for and when you bring this file onto your computer it will more often then not look a bit muted in comparison.

Here’s an example of what I mean
The before image is a completely unprocessed RAW photograph. The after image has had just five levels quickly adjusted to bring out the colors of the sunset.

Those five levels are: Exposure, white balance, contrast, highlights and shadows.

An Unprocessed RAW PhotoProcessed RAW Photo

Now, while I could have tweaked the saturation, vibrance, noise, details, or countless other areas of the photograph what I really wanted to show you here was how much freedom you have to process a RAW file with only a hand full of sliders. One great example of where RAW files are important is when shooting the stars – like in my photograph of the kayak under the stars – the RAW file enabled me to bring the exposure of the kayaks back while keeping the sky dark and the stars bright.

Okay, so that was a long winded and probably redundant post for most of you, but if you were looking for the answer to the question – What is RAW? I hope I’ve helped you out!

Please feel free to ask any questions or comment about whether or not you shoot in RAW? Or maybe you’re just finding out about it today?

Did you find this helpful or inspiring? Why not share it!

9 Responses to What is RAW Photography?

  1. Phyllis says:

    I’m still a little apprehensive to shoot “raw.” I have a Nikon D5100 and have image quality set to JPEG fine. I also don’t understand the various selections for image quality: Raw + JPEG fine; Raw + JPEG normal; Raw + JPEG basic; etc. Also, what about image size? What should that be??

    • There’s absolutely nothing wrong with shooting in JPEG as you will still definitely get quality shots in that format. To go on a bit further to answer some of the questions you asked though…

      RAW + JPEG simply means that your camera will save both a RAW image and a JPEG image for every photograph you take. For your average person this is probably overkill, but there are situations where it could come in handy, although I can’t think of any off the top of my head – maybe someone will chime in later?

      As far as JPEG fine, vs normal, vs basic is concerned it simply means the quality of the image you’ll end up with at the end. I’d highly recommend shooting in the highest quality that your camera offers as you’ll get the most detail out of it.

      Of course, there are situations where a lower quality image might make more sense. One such example might be in time-lapse photography where you would want more photographs per SD card and quality won’t matter so much here because you’ll be creating a 1920×1080 video instead of the potential large print and therefor don’t need the full resolution power of your camera.

      Hope this answers the questions and by all means keep ‘em coming! And again – thanks for stopping by I’m glad you’re enjoying the site!

  2. [...] For astrophotography you will be delving a bit deeper into the use of some of the manual controls of your camera like shutter speed, aperture, and ISO control. I also highly recommend shooting in RAW for night photography, as it will allow more control when editing the final image. If you’re not sure what RAW is and why it is important I wrote a bit about RAW photography here. [...]

  3. Mark Grauer says:

    Why would we ever shoot anything other than the RAW format? I have shot RAW before in experimentation…I am a new photographer and love experimenting.
    Does RAW take more storage space?

    Thank you.

    Mark Grauer

    • Yes a RAW file is substantially larger than a JPEG file so if you’re concerned about space either on your computer at home or in your camera then RAW file’s may not be your best option.

      Another example when JPEGS are good (even if you have the space) is for shooting time-lapse photography. This is because when you view the time-lapse you’re probably not going to need anything more than 1920×1080 in resolution. So while it’s nice to have that full resolution of the RAW file, being able to capture a longer time-lapse might outweigh the benefit of shooting in RAW.

      Hope this answers your question, thanks for the comment!

  4. L J Donelson says:

    I always shoot RAW+JPEG Fine, this gives me the JPEG right off the camera and something to share or email if needed plus the RAW I can go back and process. Cards are cheap and easy to swap, disc space is inexpensive and can be cleaned up if I am through.

  5. Sreeram says:

    Are there any free editing sites that lets you practice your hands on RAW photos or experiment with them. Or can you process the RAW file in your DSLR camera itself

  6. I hear alot about Raw or jpg but no one ever talks about the old tiff files which are no-loss files like Raw but are easier to process with out special softwear.
    The files have all the information plus basic set points and is the only no-loss file type added to all higher end Nikons besides Raw.

    • Yeah TIFFs don’t get much talk and I think it’s mainly due to the idea that camera’s shoot in RAW or JPEG by default so if you want to use a TIFF file you’re going to be converting to it rather than shooting in it.

      At least that’s my understanding.

Leave a reply